Progress Crit 1

PROGRESS  CRIT  1
DATE     : 2 NOVEMBER 2015
TIME      : 10.25 A.M.
VENUE  : GROUP 4 STUDIO RUS104, SCHOOL OF HBP, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA

LECTURER:
  1. ASSOC. PROF. DR. FUZIAH IBRAHIM
  2. DR. SITI SALWA MOHD ISHAK
  3. DR. MARIATI TAIB

PRESENCE :

  1. AZIMAN RAZIQ BIN  RIZAMAN (CHAIRMAN)
  2. AIMI ZAHIRAH BINTI ZULKARNAIN (ASSIST. CHAIRMAN)
  3. NOR SYAFQAH ATHIRAH BINTI MOHD SHAIFULLAH (SECRETARY)
  4. WEE CHEW TENG (ASSIST. SECRETARY)
  5. TAN JO YEN (TREASURES)
  6. LEE TER SOON
  7. NG YII ROU
  8. AZREEN SABRINA BINTI AB HALIM
  9. FAIZ SOLEHIN BIN SHAFIKHULLAH
  10. FATIN NABILA BINTI ABDULL RAHMAN
  11. GOH SU CHEN
  12. HANISAH BINTI AMIRUDDIN
  13. NUR NABILAH BINTI MOHAMAD BAKHTIAR
  14. MUHAMMAD HAKEEM BIN MOHD MAHAYUDDEEN
  15. GOH JIE XIN
  16. NUR SYAHIRAH BINTI ALI
  17. NURMAN BIN RAZALI


LECTURER REMARK
The lecturer begins the crit session with salam remarks  to the members who present in the meeting and invited group 4 for the site analysis prentation.

MINUTE 1 : PREPARE FOR THE CRIT SESSION
Chairman give a flow of presentation to all member before presentation.
Action: Chairman

MINUTE 2 : PRESENTATION BY MEMBER
Chairman started the presentation by introduce the site, and the point of the SWOT analysis. Each of member by site tasks come out with the data from the task such as the dimension and the orientation of the site, existing structure, services, soil profile, temperature and humidity. Our group also presentation the future area for development. From the material selection team, they decide to use piling for Royal Pavilion and makes our assumption for the site.
Action: All member

MINUTE 3 : COMMENT AND FEEDBACK FROM LECTURER
After the presentation, studio masters were giving comment and suggestion  for improving our progress.  Comments and suggestion by studio master :
  • Do not make assumption of the site and all the data must have a fact.
  • The presentation have lack of site analysis (SWOT analysis), all the member from all major must have a sense to the site.
  • The area for the future development is not suitable because near to Y junction of the pathway.
  • For the vegetation, if necessary to cut the tree for development.
  • The pile as the foundation of the Royal Pavilion is not suitable, so all members need to do more precendent studies of the structure used.
  • Lack of communication and team work.
Action: All Group 4's studio master 

After the Crit Session, all member stay back for proceed the meeting.

No comments:

Post a Comment