PROGRESS CRIT 3
DATE : 16 NOVEMBER 2015
TIME : 11.00 A.M.
VENUE : DK E48A, SCHOOL OF HBP, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
PRESENCE :
- AZIMAN RAZIQ BIN RIZAMAN (CHAIRMAN)
- AIMI ZAHIRAH BINTI ZULKARNAIN (ASSIST. CHAIRMAN)
- NOR SYAFQAH ATHIRAH BINTI MOHD SHAIFULLAH (SECRETARY)
- WEE CHEW TENG (ASSIST. SECRETARY)
- TAN JO YEN (TREASURES)
- LEE TER SOON
- NG YII ROU
- AZREEN SABRINA BINTI AB HALIM
- FAIZ SOLEHIN BIN SHAFIKHULLAH
- FATIN NABILA BINTI ABDULL RAHMAN
- GOH SU CHEN
- HANISAH BINTI AMIRUDDIN
- NUR NABILAH BINTI MOHAMAD BAKHTIAR
- MUHAMMAD HAKEEM BIN MOHD MAHAYUDDEEN
- GOH JIE XIN
- NUR SYAHIRAH BINTI ALI
- NURMAN BIN RAZALI
LECTURER REMARK
The lecturer begins the crit session with salam
remarks to the members who present in
the meeting and invited group 4 for the site analysis prentation.
MINUTE 1 :
PREPARATION FOR PRESENTATION
Chairman decide
the flow of presentation to all member before presentation.
MINUTE 2 : PRESENTATION BY MEMBER
Assistant chairman have conduct the
presentation. The presentation started by planning and site analysis team for
recap up the site analysis and landscape planning of the site. After that,
design team have introduce and explain the new proposed design based on
precedent studies of Sultan Azlan Azlan and about dome building (Rising Moon
Pavilion and Reichstag Dome). The team of material selection and building
presented the construction method and material for the Royal Pavilion. Last but
not least, presentation about the project schedule by project management and
scheduling team.
Action: Aimi Zahirah Binti Zulkarnain
Hanisah Binti Amiruddin
Nor Syafiqah Athirah Binti Mohd Shaifulah
MINUTE 3 : COMMENT AND FEEDBACK FROM LECTURER
After the presentation, studio masters were
giving comment and suggestion for
improving our progress. Comments and
suggestion by studio master :
- The location of the Royal Pavilion is danger because the structure near to the lake.
- The courtyard is not suitable in in this design because the space of 1 m radius is not enough.
- Check the method have been used for foundation.
- Some lecturer praise for the good presentation
Action: All studio master.
Figure 9: Figure 7: One of the member of group 4B (Hanisah) from material selection and building team is give a presentation of site analysis.
Figure 10: Asist.chairman of group 4B (Aimi) from design team is give a presentation of design proposal.
After the Crit Session, chairman remarks of thank you to all presenter and member for the good presentation.
No comments:
Post a Comment